Packing your next court
Packing your next court
Side-by-side specs, ₱ prices and ratings from 22 PaddleBag players who own these paddles.
Average play-style scores out of 5. Higher wins.
Luzz Glider 16mm
Wika Bao Fire 2 16mm
| Score | Glider | Bao Fire 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 3.4 | 4.6 (higher) |
| Control | 4.1 (higher) | 2.9 |
| Spin | 3.8 (higher) | 3.7 |
| Feel | 4.1 (higher) | 3.6 |
| Touch | 4.0 (higher) | 3.2 |
| Spec | Glider | Bao Fire 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Luzz | Wika |
| Year | 2026 | 2026 |
| Core | 16 mm | 16 mm |
| Weight | 7–8.5 oz | 7–8.5 oz |
| Grip | Medium | Medium |
| Handle | 5 in | 5 in |
| Face | Composite | Composite |
| Core type | Polymer | Polymer |
| USAP | unknown | unknown |
| Price (PH) | ~₱6,960 | ~₱7,830 |
~ = US retail converted to pesos. Picks prices are affiliate listings; PaddleBag may earn a commission.
PaddleBag players rate the Luzz Glider 16mm higher overall: the Luzz Glider 16mm has 3.9★ from 11 ratings and the Wika Bao Fire 2 16mm has 3.6★ from 11 ratings. Pick the Luzz Glider 16mm if you want more control, feel and touch. Pick the Wika Bao Fire 2 16mm if you want more power.
The Wika Bao Fire 2 16mm is rated higher on power — the Luzz Glider 16mm scores 3.4/5 and the Wika Bao Fire 2 16mm 4.6/5 from PaddleBag players.
The Luzz Glider 16mm is rated higher on control — the Luzz Glider 16mm scores 4.1/5 and the Wika Bao Fire 2 16mm 2.9/5 from PaddleBag players. Beginners usually improve fastest with the higher-control paddle.
They're about even on spin — the Luzz Glider 16mm scores 3.8/5 and the Wika Bao Fire 2 16mm 3.7/5 from PaddleBag players.
About ~₱6,960 for the Luzz Glider 16mm and ~₱7,830 for the Wika Bao Fire 2 16mm. Prices with ~ are US retail converted to pesos; local sellers vary, so compare before you buy.
PaddleBag lists the Luzz Glider 16mm as unknown and the Wika Bao Fire 2 16mm as unknown.
1 PaddleBag player has both paddles in their public bag.
